The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines defeatism as the attitude of accepting, expecting, or being resigned to defeat, while pessimism is defined as an inclination to emphasize adverse aspects, conditions, and possibilities or to expect the worst possible outcome. Bearing this in mind, it shouldn’t be difficult for one to analyze why such an attitude is found in our countrymen- and indeed in us. On the 14th of August 1947 the foundation of this nation was laid- and with it were laid the seeds of optimism, and belief, and hope. Hope, that we will progress- hope that we will overcome the difficulties facing us and hope that we will finally take our rightful place in this world. But where exactly did this hope lead us? It lead us to disappointment after disappointment, defeat after defeat. And slowly, but surely, optimism turned to realism- and the realization that we, indeed, are a sorry bunch. Hence- to say that the people of Pakistan are wrong in being pessimistic in their approach would be a great injustice to what they have gone through. It is after years of experience, experience that has come at a very heavy price that we have accepted the reality of where we stand in today’s world. It isn’t merely pessimism- it’s realism.
The attitude of the people justified- we must now look to see how we can use it to our advantage. The thing with an optimistic approach is that though it has a great deal of benefits, it can often lead to an acceptance of the deluded truth. An optimist, as everyone knows, sees the glass as half full. The problem with this is that such an approach can lead to complacency and false hope- and as the people of Pakistan know, false hope is a a very painful thing. A pessimist, on the other hand, sees the glass as half empty- and that is where I see him at an advantage. Only a person who is willing to accept that the glass is half empty can sense the urgency that is required to fill the glass. Besides that, the pessimist ‘expects the worst possible scenario’. This, again, is a blessing in disguise. If you expect the worst possible outcome, but it so turns out that something better is in store, you have something to rejoice at- A win-win situation. Here, again, an optimist is at a sure disadvantage.
However, that said, the attitude of a defeatist can never be justified. Pessimism, as far as expecting the worst outcome and seeing the negative aspects of issues, is perfectly alright, but that doesn’t mean that one lets things be and labels working for the country as a ‘hopeless cause’- to the contrary, action is the need of the hour in such a situation. And in this regard, and this only, one needs to be optimistic- albeit, cautiously- hours of hard work can be destroyed by a single, unnecessary decision.
Hence, to conclude, i quote Khalil Gibran- whose saying captures the essence of whatever I have written-
“The optimist sees the rose and not its thorns; the pessimist stares at the thorns, oblivious to the rose”
“On the 14th of August 1947 the foundation of this nation was laid- and with it were laid the seeds of optimism, and belief, and hope. Hope, that we will progress- hope that we will overcome the difficulties facing us and hope that we will finally take our rightful place in this world. But where exactly did this hope lead us?”
it was hope that took us where we stand today, sir. a lot better than most nations of the world. we started from a scratch, yet we hoped, we worked, worked together and attained ’some’ stability. and now, that we’ve so much to make use of.. we’re being pessimistic, or realistic as you put it! :p
‘a lot better than most nations of the world’
True. but with the potential that we possess, and the resources that we have, we are still far behind where we should be. I do not believe we started from scratch- a lot was granted to us by the British when they left, for example the extensive rail system- which, today, lies in a worse state than in 1947. A commentator on tv recently pointed out that the length of the railway lines today is less than back then, which i truly found shocking. 60 years of working together and we couldn’t even ‘maintain’ a system that was already made?
The truth is that ‘if’ we had worked together, we would never have reached this state. What Pakistan is today is due to individual efforts of a countless number of brilliant men- like Abdul Sattar Edhi, and Dr. Adeeb Rizvi to name a couple. Not due to any collective effort of the nation.
And, how can i say anyone is wrong in being pessimistic, when every regime to date has failed to provide even the basic necessities of life to the common man? Patriotism is a truly noble emotion- but how can one be patriotic to a nation that doesn’t provide one with a meal to eat, and a bed to sleep on?
And in no way am i suggesting that we should sit back and criticize, and not do anything about it